<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A myriad of ways to make users sign-in</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2005/11/22/a-myriad-of-ways-to-make-users-sign-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2005/11/22/a-myriad-of-ways-to-make-users-sign-in/</link>
	<description>UIE\'s latest insights on the world of design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:19:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2005/11/22/a-myriad-of-ways-to-make-users-sign-in/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=128#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Best buy has the best option as you&#039;ve implied, and Daniel also adds a good point that, other than &quot;next time it&#039;ll be faster&quot; you don&#039;t really know what you&#039;re getting.  By now, I think most of us savvy folk realize it means you&#039;re going to store my shipping/billing address for next time.

I understand that companies want me to be a returning customer- but there are plenty of reasons and situation where the customer will be a one time shopper and doesn&#039;t need to have an account created.  For example, if I buy a knitting set from knittersworld.com for my Aunt tillie for X-Mas.  Please... spare me the time of answering how often do you knit?&quot; type questions just to ship this thing off.

And to make matters worse, as you mention in another recent post here- you always have different rules, logins, passwords and pwd rules that make remembering any login information for smaller, niche sites almost pointless.  I almost always immediately click the &quot;forgot your password&quot; link to run the guantlet of options there, and they end up emailing me.  Why can&#039;t I use my email address for my login (like amazon)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best buy has the best option as you&#8217;ve implied, and Daniel also adds a good point that, other than &#8220;next time it&#8217;ll be faster&#8221; you don&#8217;t really know what you&#8217;re getting.  By now, I think most of us savvy folk realize it means you&#8217;re going to store my shipping/billing address for next time.</p>
<p>I understand that companies want me to be a returning customer- but there are plenty of reasons and situation where the customer will be a one time shopper and doesn&#8217;t need to have an account created.  For example, if I buy a knitting set from knittersworld.com for my Aunt tillie for X-Mas.  Please&#8230; spare me the time of answering how often do you knit?&#8221; type questions just to ship this thing off.</p>
<p>And to make matters worse, as you mention in another recent post here- you always have different rules, logins, passwords and pwd rules that make remembering any login information for smaller, niche sites almost pointless.  I almost always immediately click the &#8220;forgot your password&#8221; link to run the guantlet of options there, and they end up emailing me.  Why can&#8217;t I use my email address for my login (like amazon)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Szuc</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2005/11/22/a-myriad-of-ways-to-make-users-sign-in/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Szuc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=128#comment-302</guid>
		<description>One element they seem to miss are the *benefits* of registering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One element they seem to miss are the *benefits* of registering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les Cochrane</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2005/11/22/a-myriad-of-ways-to-make-users-sign-in/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Les Cochrane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=128#comment-301</guid>
		<description>Working on a site for a customer that is due to go live in the near future, we came across a common view: &quot;Amazon sell a lot of products, they know what they&#039;re doing, so we want our site to have the same login&quot;

After a little grey matter abuse (and watching people fumble with the Amazon style login), I&#039;ve implemented a bit of unobtrusive Javascript that hides the password field, until the &#039;I am a returning customer&#039; radio button is clicked; it then shows the password field and puts focus on it. 

Clicking on the I am a new customer radio button then hides the password field again.

If the customer doesn&#039;t have javascript (about 8-10% of the clients customers), they just get the standard amazon style interface.

Would you consider this a good solution, as it seems to improve the customer experience and keep the client happy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Working on a site for a customer that is due to go live in the near future, we came across a common view: &#8220;Amazon sell a lot of products, they know what they&#8217;re doing, so we want our site to have the same login&#8221;</p>
<p>After a little grey matter abuse (and watching people fumble with the Amazon style login), I&#8217;ve implemented a bit of unobtrusive Javascript that hides the password field, until the &#8216;I am a returning customer&#8217; radio button is clicked; it then shows the password field and puts focus on it. </p>
<p>Clicking on the I am a new customer radio button then hides the password field again.</p>
<p>If the customer doesn&#8217;t have javascript (about 8-10% of the clients customers), they just get the standard amazon style interface.</p>
<p>Would you consider this a good solution, as it seems to improve the customer experience and keep the client happy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Scheid</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2005/11/22/a-myriad-of-ways-to-make-users-sign-in/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Scheid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=128#comment-299</guid>
		<description>OVO Studios used to have a page about this too. It&#039;s still available via the web archive:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://web.archive.org/web/20040204042746/http://www.ovostudios.com/weblogin/index.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Collection of Login/Register Screens&lt;/a&gt;

I see that Amazon has tweaked and simplified their interface since 2004-02-04.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OVO Studios used to have a page about this too. It&#8217;s still available via the web archive:</p>
<p><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20040204042746/http://www.ovostudios.com/weblogin/index.htm" rel="nofollow">A Collection of Login/Register Screens</a></p>
<p>I see that Amazon has tweaked and simplified their interface since 2004-02-04.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
