<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Determining Link Order on Intranet Portals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/01/20/determining-link-order-on-intranet-portals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/01/20/determining-link-order-on-intranet-portals/</link>
	<description>UIE\'s latest insights on the world of design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:27:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: My blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Determining link order on intranet portals</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/01/20/determining-link-order-on-intranet-portals/comment-page-1/#comment-1575</link>
		<dc:creator>My blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Determining link order on intranet portals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=167#comment-1575</guid>
		<description>[...] Determining Link Order on Intranet Portals by Jared Spool on UIE Brain. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Determining Link Order on Intranet Portals by Jared Spool on UIE Brain. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Steinway</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/01/20/determining-link-order-on-intranet-portals/comment-page-1/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Steinway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 00:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=167#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>I disagree that links should be ordered by importance. Importance to whom? To Tom &quot;grape&quot; is more important than &quot;apple.&quot; To Sally &quot;banana&quot; is more important than &quot;apple&quot; or &quot;grape.&quot; In a company of 12,000 employees, we order alphabetically on the intranet because we were constantly being told what was more important than the first thing on the list. Importance is determined by your role in the company and everyone&#039;s role is slightly different. The one item that breaks this policy is the link to the timesheet, which everyone must fill out daily. It is out of order alphabetically on its list because it is most important to everyone. We also offer a portal interface that let&#039;s users have a window of their favorite links, because everyone&#039;s are different. Unfortunately, democracy didn&#039;t work for us in our intranet design. We order alphabetically (in most cases).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree that links should be ordered by importance. Importance to whom? To Tom &#8220;grape&#8221; is more important than &#8220;apple.&#8221; To Sally &#8220;banana&#8221; is more important than &#8220;apple&#8221; or &#8220;grape.&#8221; In a company of 12,000 employees, we order alphabetically on the intranet because we were constantly being told what was more important than the first thing on the list. Importance is determined by your role in the company and everyone&#8217;s role is slightly different. The one item that breaks this policy is the link to the timesheet, which everyone must fill out daily. It is out of order alphabetically on its list because it is most important to everyone. We also offer a portal interface that let&#8217;s users have a window of their favorite links, because everyone&#8217;s are different. Unfortunately, democracy didn&#8217;t work for us in our intranet design. We order alphabetically (in most cases).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spautz</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/01/20/determining-link-order-on-intranet-portals/comment-page-1/#comment-1033</link>
		<dc:creator>spautz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 00:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=167#comment-1033</guid>
		<description>Alan Cooper and Ellen Isaacs mention similar techniques in their books, although they use the term &quot;necessary&quot; instead of &quot;important&quot;, and they apply it to feature priority rather than the link order. It seems like some of the misunderstanding about these scales results from the ambiguity of &quot;important&quot;&#8212;would using the term &quot;necessary&quot; in your scale change its meaning?

If not, is the &quot;determine necessity and frequency, and use that to determine significance&quot; technique a general pattern which could be applied elsewhere? Are there any areas where that general pattern might be inappropriate or detrimental? (aside from places where there&#039;s already a well-established convention for order/priority)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan Cooper and Ellen Isaacs mention similar techniques in their books, although they use the term &#8220;necessary&#8221; instead of &#8220;important&#8221;, and they apply it to feature priority rather than the link order. It seems like some of the misunderstanding about these scales results from the ambiguity of &#8220;important&#8221;&mdash;would using the term &#8220;necessary&#8221; in your scale change its meaning?</p>
<p>If not, is the &#8220;determine necessity and frequency, and use that to determine significance&#8221; technique a general pattern which could be applied elsewhere? Are there any areas where that general pattern might be inappropriate or detrimental? (aside from places where there&#8217;s already a well-established convention for order/priority)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; UIE Brain Sparks » Blog Archive » Determining Link Order on Intranet Portals</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/01/20/determining-link-order-on-intranet-portals/comment-page-1/#comment-1029</link>
		<dc:creator>My blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; UIE Brain Sparks » Blog Archive » Determining Link Order on Intranet Portals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=167#comment-1029</guid>
		<description>[...] UIE Brain Sparks » Blog Archive » Determining Link Order on Intranet Portals Link order is also very important. Well-designed portals put the most important links at the very top and order the remaining links by priority and need. In our studies, poorly-designed portals often resort to alphabetical order, which confuses employees as they expect related links to be group together with the most critical functions near the top. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UIE Brain Sparks » Blog Archive » Determining Link Order on Intranet Portals Link order is also very important. Well-designed portals put the most important links at the very top and order the remaining links by priority and need. In our studies, poorly-designed portals often resort to alphabetical order, which confuses employees as they expect related links to be group together with the most critical functions near the top. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesper Rønn-Jensen</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/01/20/determining-link-order-on-intranet-portals/comment-page-1/#comment-1013</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesper Rønn-Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=167#comment-1013</guid>
		<description>I think I misunderstand your scales: As far as I understand, an unimportant task that&#039;s used very frequently gets the same score as an important task used infrequently.

Shouldn&#039;t the important task score higher?
Please give us all the juicy details!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I misunderstand your scales: As far as I understand, an unimportant task that&#8217;s used very frequently gets the same score as an important task used infrequently.</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t the important task score higher?<br />
Please give us all the juicy details!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
