<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Branding and the Million Dollar Homepage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/01/25/branding-and-the-million-dollar-homepage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/01/25/branding-and-the-million-dollar-homepage/</link>
	<description>UIE\'s latest insights on the world of design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 00:44:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: radio publicity</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/01/25/branding-and-the-million-dollar-homepage/comment-page-1/#comment-144138</link>
		<dc:creator>radio publicity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 03:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=171#comment-144138</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;radio publicity...&lt;/strong&gt;

Hey, if you are into contests there is a great contest on YouTube for Valentines Day. The contest is to create a video for the holiday. Actually its two contests, one is to make a video talking about your great love and the second is to actually do an ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>radio publicity&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Hey, if you are into contests there is a great contest on YouTube for Valentines Day. The contest is to create a video for the holiday. Actually its two contests, one is to make a video talking about your great love and the second is to actually do an &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/01/25/branding-and-the-million-dollar-homepage/comment-page-1/#comment-1513</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 23:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=171#comment-1513</guid>
		<description>I agree that sites that have cloned the million dollar homepage will never be successful. For the most part, I think Alex Tew just got lucky that everyone talked about his idea. The whole pixel market is so saturated that most sites now can&#039;t even sell a good sized spot for a dollar.

I have a site which was not inspired by the million dollar home page.  Because of its creativity it is doing quite well unlike all the pixel sites out there.  I am however a little worried because of several copy cats I have already seen.  It appears that everybody is out to make money on other people&#039;s ideas.

Gary
&lt;a href=&#039;www.VirtualWorldRealEstate.com&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Virtual World Real Estate&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that sites that have cloned the million dollar homepage will never be successful. For the most part, I think Alex Tew just got lucky that everyone talked about his idea. The whole pixel market is so saturated that most sites now can&#8217;t even sell a good sized spot for a dollar.</p>
<p>I have a site which was not inspired by the million dollar home page.  Because of its creativity it is doing quite well unlike all the pixel sites out there.  I am however a little worried because of several copy cats I have already seen.  It appears that everybody is out to make money on other people&#8217;s ideas.</p>
<p>Gary<br />
<a href='www.VirtualWorldRealEstate.com' rel="nofollow">Virtual World Real Estate</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/01/25/branding-and-the-million-dollar-homepage/comment-page-1/#comment-1431</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=171#comment-1431</guid>
		<description>I think I would tend to agree.  

From a marketing perspective, we tend to look at &quot;limited available&quot; spots on places such as news sites (such as http://www.24-7pressrelease.com), where we know that branding is the key.  

Although click through rate may not be as high as Google, we are there for branding.  In a place such as Alex&#039;s home page, unless you take out a 200 x 400 ($80,000), ad, your picture will be pretty much lost!  

Marketing Associate
Angelbodywear.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I would tend to agree.  </p>
<p>From a marketing perspective, we tend to look at &#8220;limited available&#8221; spots on places such as news sites (such as <a href="http://www.24-7pressrelease.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.24-7pressrelease.com</a>), where we know that branding is the key.  </p>
<p>Although click through rate may not be as high as Google, we are there for branding.  In a place such as Alex&#8217;s home page, unless you take out a 200 x 400 ($80,000), ad, your picture will be pretty much lost!  </p>
<p>Marketing Associate<br />
Angelbodywear.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zephyr</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/01/25/branding-and-the-million-dollar-homepage/comment-page-1/#comment-1274</link>
		<dc:creator>Zephyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 20:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=171#comment-1274</guid>
		<description>Seems to me like the only reason this worked in the first place, was the novelty value. It created a huge hype, drawing many people to the page, a percentage of whom probably decided to click through on an ad. But after the hype, what does an unsightly page like this do for the average visitor? If the idea continues to make money, it will probably be for the people offering the advertising space, not the people advertising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me like the only reason this worked in the first place, was the novelty value. It created a huge hype, drawing many people to the page, a percentage of whom probably decided to click through on an ad. But after the hype, what does an unsightly page like this do for the average visitor? If the idea continues to make money, it will probably be for the people offering the advertising space, not the people advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/01/25/branding-and-the-million-dollar-homepage/comment-page-1/#comment-1249</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 16:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=171#comment-1249</guid>
		<description>I believe that you are right in that it will only be really successful once. We are very pleased with our investment in the Million Dollar Homepage. I managed to get in there quite early, buying the large red /blue and white target near the centre of the page. 

Within that image there are links to 5 different websites. Our main Corporate Gifts website reached a peak of 5000 unique visitors a day and has levelled off to 500 a day at the moment.

I know the traffic is untargeted, but there are ways to increase the success of it. I found that a easy way to get more benefit is to have a special offer on the page that is linked to by the MDHP. We have now recouped a large part of our investment within 3 months.

Thanks Alex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that you are right in that it will only be really successful once. We are very pleased with our investment in the Million Dollar Homepage. I managed to get in there quite early, buying the large red /blue and white target near the centre of the page. </p>
<p>Within that image there are links to 5 different websites. Our main Corporate Gifts website reached a peak of 5000 unique visitors a day and has levelled off to 500 a day at the moment.</p>
<p>I know the traffic is untargeted, but there are ways to increase the success of it. I found that a easy way to get more benefit is to have a special offer on the page that is linked to by the MDHP. We have now recouped a large part of our investment within 3 months.</p>
<p>Thanks Alex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lumpy</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/01/25/branding-and-the-million-dollar-homepage/comment-page-1/#comment-1203</link>
		<dc:creator>Lumpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=171#comment-1203</guid>
		<description>I think it will only work once.  It is a novelty.  Granted people do click out of curiosity but, in general, they click if it meets wants and needs.

I looked over the million dollor pixel blog and, if we assume started the project with the first blog entry and ended it with the announcement of the E-bay auction winner, then he sold over 6000 pixels/day.

Now, if one goes to the site of your first commenter,  the site shows that it has sold 300 pixels.  If the commenter&#039;s site has existed for only one day, it is performing at less that 5 hundredths of a percent compared original idea.

I think that about sums up it being duplicated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it will only work once.  It is a novelty.  Granted people do click out of curiosity but, in general, they click if it meets wants and needs.</p>
<p>I looked over the million dollor pixel blog and, if we assume started the project with the first blog entry and ended it with the announcement of the E-bay auction winner, then he sold over 6000 pixels/day.</p>
<p>Now, if one goes to the site of your first commenter,  the site shows that it has sold 300 pixels.  If the commenter&#8217;s site has existed for only one day, it is performing at less that 5 hundredths of a percent compared original idea.</p>
<p>I think that about sums up it being duplicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aman</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/01/25/branding-and-the-million-dollar-homepage/comment-page-1/#comment-1195</link>
		<dc:creator>aman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=171#comment-1195</guid>
		<description>did that pay i dont believe it.pictures woven togeather</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did that pay i dont believe it.pictures woven togeather</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srinivasan</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/01/25/branding-and-the-million-dollar-homepage/comment-page-1/#comment-1127</link>
		<dc:creator>Srinivasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=171#comment-1127</guid>
		<description>Hi,
 
   I disagree with your conclusions, for the following reasons:

1. The whole advertising model on the Internet is based on the assumption that &quot;targeting&quot; is the same as &quot;context&quot;. For example, the assumption is that if a user searches for briefcases, a briefcase advertisement must be served, because the user is most likely to click on that advertisement. 

2. What is ignored in Point 1, is the fact that the user will  click on an advertisement if it interests him, EVEN IF it is in no way relevant to the context. 

Originally, this is how advertising used to work, but with the advent of Adwords etc, this fact is being forgotten. For example, If I am a Soccer fan, I will click on Soccer Ads, even if they show up when I am searching for something else.

3. What is also ignored in Point 1, is the fact that there is a &quot;Curiosity&quot; element when ppl click on ANYTHING. The Million Dollar Homepage concept is testimony for this fact. Sometimes, ppl click on ads just because they are curious. Is there something BIG here that everyone has managed to ignore?

As an experiment, based on the Million Dollar Homepage Concept, we are trying to build a Compendium of Web2.0 companies, in Pixels, at http://www.web20milliondollarhomepage.com/. 

The idea is simple: it will prove if Point 3 listed above is a huge market waiting to be tapped.

Do have a look, and let us know what you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>   I disagree with your conclusions, for the following reasons:</p>
<p>1. The whole advertising model on the Internet is based on the assumption that &#8220;targeting&#8221; is the same as &#8220;context&#8221;. For example, the assumption is that if a user searches for briefcases, a briefcase advertisement must be served, because the user is most likely to click on that advertisement. </p>
<p>2. What is ignored in Point 1, is the fact that the user will  click on an advertisement if it interests him, EVEN IF it is in no way relevant to the context. </p>
<p>Originally, this is how advertising used to work, but with the advent of Adwords etc, this fact is being forgotten. For example, If I am a Soccer fan, I will click on Soccer Ads, even if they show up when I am searching for something else.</p>
<p>3. What is also ignored in Point 1, is the fact that there is a &#8220;Curiosity&#8221; element when ppl click on ANYTHING. The Million Dollar Homepage concept is testimony for this fact. Sometimes, ppl click on ads just because they are curious. Is there something BIG here that everyone has managed to ignore?</p>
<p>As an experiment, based on the Million Dollar Homepage Concept, we are trying to build a Compendium of Web2.0 companies, in Pixels, at <a href="http://www.web20milliondollarhomepage.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.web20milliondollarhomepage.com/</a>. </p>
<p>The idea is simple: it will prove if Point 3 listed above is a huge market waiting to be tapped.</p>
<p>Do have a look, and let us know what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
