<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Death March for Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/07/31/the-death-march-for-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/07/31/the-death-march-for-advertising/</link>
	<description>UIE\'s latest insights on the world of design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 00:44:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/07/31/the-death-march-for-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-36399</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=290#comment-36399</guid>
		<description>This is simply the best article I&#039;ve read on the Net in quite some time.   

It would take a book to express my full reaction, but let&#039;s skip all that, and just let me say thanks to the author for an inspiring, thoughtful piece that helps renew my enthusisam for the world I work in.  

Sure, none of us can know exactly how this will play out, but you are so on the right track.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is simply the best article I&#8217;ve read on the Net in quite some time.   </p>
<p>It would take a book to express my full reaction, but let&#8217;s skip all that, and just let me say thanks to the author for an inspiring, thoughtful piece that helps renew my enthusisam for the world I work in.  </p>
<p>Sure, none of us can know exactly how this will play out, but you are so on the right track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anthillz &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-08-31</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/07/31/the-death-march-for-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-23116</link>
		<dc:creator>anthillz &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-08-31</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=290#comment-23116</guid>
		<description>[...] The Death March for Advertising (tags: advertising marketing culture) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Death March for Advertising (tags: advertising marketing culture) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dock: Login</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/07/31/the-death-march-for-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-22813</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dock: Login</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=290#comment-22813</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indirect Manipulation &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Evidence of Autumn</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/07/31/the-death-march-for-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-22710</link>
		<dc:creator>Indirect Manipulation &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Evidence of Autumn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=290#comment-22710</guid>
		<description>[...] Armano also points to this interesting article concerning the end of advertising. Jared Spool feels that the day is coming when client organizations will simply stop paying for solutions whose results cannot be measured. In fact, he feels the very premise of modern advertising is flawed by antiquated thinking: Since the first days of newspaper advertising, it’s been accepted by everyone that advertising is non-accountable. Advertising works, based on faith in the premise that if you put an ad in front of enough people enough times, they spend money. But everyone knows accepting the premise is hard. In fact, if you talk to anyone in the advertising business, they can recite the joke often attributed to Philadelphia merchant John Wannamaker: “I know half my advertising budget is wasted. The trouble is I don’t know which half.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Armano also points to this interesting article concerning the end of advertising. Jared Spool feels that the day is coming when client organizations will simply stop paying for solutions whose results cannot be measured. In fact, he feels the very premise of modern advertising is flawed by antiquated thinking: Since the first days of newspaper advertising, it’s been accepted by everyone that advertising is non-accountable. Advertising works, based on faith in the premise that if you put an ad in front of enough people enough times, they spend money. But everyone knows accepting the premise is hard. In fact, if you talk to anyone in the advertising business, they can recite the joke often attributed to Philadelphia merchant John Wannamaker: “I know half my advertising budget is wasted. The trouble is I don’t know which half.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adaptive path &#187; blog &#187; blog archive &#187; Advertising as a Differentiator for Online Experiences</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/07/31/the-death-march-for-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-22550</link>
		<dc:creator>adaptive path &#187; blog &#187; blog archive &#187; Advertising as a Differentiator for Online Experiences</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=290#comment-22550</guid>
		<description>[...] And that&#8217;s what people do. Jared Spool, among others, has been talking and writing about the Death March for Advertising and how research shows that web site visitors quickly develop techniques to avoid looking at ads. It&#8217;s not enough to make online ads contextually relevant. Google has done a decent job with that; and people have learned to ignore them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And that&#8217;s what people do. Jared Spool, among others, has been talking and writing about the Death March for Advertising and how research shows that web site visitors quickly develop techniques to avoid looking at ads. It&#8217;s not enough to make online ads contextually relevant. Google has done a decent job with that; and people have learned to ignore them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Armano</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/07/31/the-death-march-for-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-19703</link>
		<dc:creator>David Armano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 02:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=290#comment-19703</guid>
		<description>Jared.  In spirit I agree as &quot;advertising as we know it&quot; may indeed die.  But I prefer to use the word evolve.  As it&#039;s more accurate and realistic.  I too was at ADtech (Digitas) and our panel talked about the value of providing a good experience.  But we didn&#039;t leave it at that—we got into some detail on the role that digital experience design will play in the lives of customers moving forward.

Advertisers will need to learn the language of good design which leads to great experiences.  This leads to people saying positive things (uhhhh, word of mouth anyone?).  It&#039;s why we talk about Trader Joe&#039;s like they have liberated us from the opression of Supermarket mega chains.

Advertising will adapt.  Some individuals wont.  Those will be the ones who die to use your analogy.  The rest will evolve into a new kind of organism, much better equipped to thrive in the world of the enlightened, empowered customer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jared.  In spirit I agree as &#8220;advertising as we know it&#8221; may indeed die.  But I prefer to use the word evolve.  As it&#8217;s more accurate and realistic.  I too was at ADtech (Digitas) and our panel talked about the value of providing a good experience.  But we didn&#8217;t leave it at that—we got into some detail on the role that digital experience design will play in the lives of customers moving forward.</p>
<p>Advertisers will need to learn the language of good design which leads to great experiences.  This leads to people saying positive things (uhhhh, word of mouth anyone?).  It&#8217;s why we talk about Trader Joe&#8217;s like they have liberated us from the opression of Supermarket mega chains.</p>
<p>Advertising will adapt.  Some individuals wont.  Those will be the ones who die to use your analogy.  The rest will evolve into a new kind of organism, much better equipped to thrive in the world of the enlightened, empowered customer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Spool</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/07/31/the-death-march-for-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-19679</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Spool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=290#comment-19679</guid>
		<description>Marvin,

I don&#039;t believe the myth that &lt;em&gt;users expect everything for free&lt;/em&gt;. I think HBO, the Wall Street Journal, Consumer Reports, and, yes, 37Signals have all proved, among others, that people will pay for quality content and services.

People will pay for value. The trick is understanding what that value is. 

In the current world of advertising sponsorships of content, the content producer focuses less on the value to the consumer and, instead, focuses on delivering value to the advertiser. Sometimes, they can deliver that value by producing high-quality audiences for the advertisers. But, more times than not, they don&#039;t. 

Since advertisers can&#039;t tell if their spend is working for them, it wasn&#039;t worth the effort to make something people really want. The result is advertiser-sponsored content bends to the mediocre.

I think that if companies focus on delivering a great experience (which we know means having great content with a frustration-free delivery), we&#039;ll see them have no trouble getting people to pay for it. 

Advertisers not required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marvin,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe the myth that <em>users expect everything for free</em>. I think HBO, the Wall Street Journal, Consumer Reports, and, yes, 37Signals have all proved, among others, that people will pay for quality content and services.</p>
<p>People will pay for value. The trick is understanding what that value is. </p>
<p>In the current world of advertising sponsorships of content, the content producer focuses less on the value to the consumer and, instead, focuses on delivering value to the advertiser. Sometimes, they can deliver that value by producing high-quality audiences for the advertisers. But, more times than not, they don&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Since advertisers can&#8217;t tell if their spend is working for them, it wasn&#8217;t worth the effort to make something people really want. The result is advertiser-sponsored content bends to the mediocre.</p>
<p>I think that if companies focus on delivering a great experience (which we know means having great content with a frustration-free delivery), we&#8217;ll see them have no trouble getting people to pay for it. </p>
<p>Advertisers not required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marvin</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/07/31/the-death-march-for-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-19675</link>
		<dc:creator>Marvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=290#comment-19675</guid>
		<description>Jared,

If I agree with what you said, I see an interesting dilemma.  It seems to me that services like Google adsense have provided developers with a tack on business model/revenue generator.  With the death of advertising how do you see startups funding themselves in a world where users expect everything for free.  Do you see a media startups building their own targeted ad engines ?  Very few startups, especially of the media type, have found viability with a suscription service. Only a few notables come to mind like 37 signals, saleforce.com, etc.. and they seem to be oriented for business rather than personal use.  I am very interested to hear your opinion on this. Keep up the great work, I look forward to your posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jared,</p>
<p>If I agree with what you said, I see an interesting dilemma.  It seems to me that services like Google adsense have provided developers with a tack on business model/revenue generator.  With the death of advertising how do you see startups funding themselves in a world where users expect everything for free.  Do you see a media startups building their own targeted ad engines ?  Very few startups, especially of the media type, have found viability with a suscription service. Only a few notables come to mind like 37 signals, saleforce.com, etc.. and they seem to be oriented for business rather than personal use.  I am very interested to hear your opinion on this. Keep up the great work, I look forward to your posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2006/07/31/the-death-march-for-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-19502</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=290#comment-19502</guid>
		<description>Jared,
I’ve spent a couple of thousand hours over the last few years analysing website visitor behaviour and I totally agree with your analysis, except that I don’t think the situation will change very fast in the Internet space even though this is the most accountable and measurable of all advertising media.
How many online ads are counted as viewed when they are blocked by an ad blocker? Yet advertisers still spend money on this.
How many online ads are counted as served when a website visitor closes the ad down before it has even completely appeared on their screen? Yet advertisers still spend their money on this?
How many online ads annoy website visitors and create a negative brand experience the opposite effect to that the advertiser intends? Yet advertisers still spend their money.
How many companies undertake Search Engine Optimisation only to direct customers to useless or ineffective landing pages? Yet advertisers are spending increasing amounts of money on this activity.
Internet Advertising is set to grow globally to $51.6 billion by 2010 at a rate of 18.1% (Source PricewaterhouseCoopers 2006).
We live in a consumer world where black is marketed as white, the Emperor has no clothes and truth and logic have little place.
I agree with you but I think you underestimate the timescale that will be involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jared,<br />
I’ve spent a couple of thousand hours over the last few years analysing website visitor behaviour and I totally agree with your analysis, except that I don’t think the situation will change very fast in the Internet space even though this is the most accountable and measurable of all advertising media.<br />
How many online ads are counted as viewed when they are blocked by an ad blocker? Yet advertisers still spend money on this.<br />
How many online ads are counted as served when a website visitor closes the ad down before it has even completely appeared on their screen? Yet advertisers still spend their money on this?<br />
How many online ads annoy website visitors and create a negative brand experience the opposite effect to that the advertiser intends? Yet advertisers still spend their money.<br />
How many companies undertake Search Engine Optimisation only to direct customers to useless or ineffective landing pages? Yet advertisers are spending increasing amounts of money on this activity.<br />
Internet Advertising is set to grow globally to $51.6 billion by 2010 at a rate of 18.1% (Source PricewaterhouseCoopers 2006).<br />
We live in a consumer world where black is marketed as white, the Emperor has no clothes and truth and logic have little place.<br />
I agree with you but I think you underestimate the timescale that will be involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
