<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New WellsFargo.com Home Page</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/09/new-wellsfargocom-home-page/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/09/new-wellsfargocom-home-page/</link>
	<description>UIE\'s latest insights on the world of design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:32:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bulgarian Experience &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-04-14</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/09/new-wellsfargocom-home-page/comment-page-1/#comment-84313</link>
		<dc:creator>Bulgarian Experience &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-04-14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 07:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/09/new-wellsfargocom-home-page/#comment-84313</guid>
		<description>[...] UIE Brain Sparks » Blog Archive » New WellsFargo.com Home Page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UIE Brain Sparks » Blog Archive » New WellsFargo.com Home Page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/09/new-wellsfargocom-home-page/comment-page-1/#comment-70381</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/09/new-wellsfargocom-home-page/#comment-70381</guid>
		<description>Excuse the anonymity. BUT, I wanted to share an inside story, which is that WF tested designs of their home page a few years back, including a link-rich but almost no-graphic version. And while it performed very well, it failed on one key measure -- user&#039;s confidence. Why?

Because it didn&#039;t have an image of a stagecoach. Even though it had the logo, WF customers have grown so accustomed to the stagecoach, that, without it, they had a pang of uncertainty. 

So, the stagecoach went back in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse the anonymity. BUT, I wanted to share an inside story, which is that WF tested designs of their home page a few years back, including a link-rich but almost no-graphic version. And while it performed very well, it failed on one key measure &#8212; user&#8217;s confidence. Why?</p>
<p>Because it didn&#8217;t have an image of a stagecoach. Even though it had the logo, WF customers have grown so accustomed to the stagecoach, that, without it, they had a pang of uncertainty. </p>
<p>So, the stagecoach went back in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Spool</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/09/new-wellsfargocom-home-page/comment-page-1/#comment-69649</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Spool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/09/new-wellsfargocom-home-page/#comment-69649</guid>
		<description>The two link styles was the first thing I asked about. (There&#039;s actually 3 if you count the &quot;More &gt;&quot; link.)

Their answer: the different styles tested well with users. They understood the non-underlined bold words to be categories, whereas the underlined normal phrases to be special details. In their tests, the Wells team didn&#039;t see any confusion amongst the users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The two link styles was the first thing I asked about. (There&#8217;s actually 3 if you count the &#8220;More >&#8221; link.)</p>
<p>Their answer: the different styles tested well with users. They understood the non-underlined bold words to be categories, whereas the underlined normal phrases to be special details. In their tests, the Wells team didn&#8217;t see any confusion amongst the users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh G.</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/09/new-wellsfargocom-home-page/comment-page-1/#comment-69624</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/09/new-wellsfargocom-home-page/#comment-69624</guid>
		<description>Definitely an improvement. Though I&#039;m stumped as to why they thought having two different link styles, side by side no less, would be a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely an improvement. Though I&#8217;m stumped as to why they thought having two different link styles, side by side no less, would be a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
