<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why MySpace is Good for Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/</link>
	<description>UIE\'s latest insights on the world of design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:11:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gardening with my Gay Best Friend in Pet Society &#171; Pet Society Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-144735</link>
		<dc:creator>Gardening with my Gay Best Friend in Pet Society &#171; Pet Society Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 04:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-144735</guid>
		<description>[...] Society is much like early MySpace in that it&#8217;s filled with visual clutter (e.g. Pink Walls + Orange Couch = Bad Taste), but Clemmie&#8217;s house is an example of beautiful [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Society is much like early MySpace in that it&#8217;s filled with visual clutter (e.g. Pink Walls + Orange Couch = Bad Taste), but Clemmie&#8217;s house is an example of beautiful [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Design &#38; Aesthetics &#171; EduBits</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-143547</link>
		<dc:creator>Design &#38; Aesthetics &#171; EduBits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 03:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-143547</guid>
		<description>[...] August 18, 2008 Filed under: Uncategorized &#124;   Despite its popularity, there is definitely a UI constituency out there who don&#8217;t find the aesthetics of MySpace very appealing. For those perhaps seeking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] August 18, 2008 Filed under: Uncategorized |   Despite its popularity, there is definitely a UI constituency out there who don&#8217;t find the aesthetics of MySpace very appealing. For those perhaps seeking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Design Sapling &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MySpace is a Dirty Apartment</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-82199</link>
		<dc:creator>Design Sapling &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MySpace is a Dirty Apartment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-82199</guid>
		<description>[...] Joshua Porter at  User Interface Engineer  thinks MySpace is  Good for Design. He&#8217;s right, it definitely sparks conversation. While some people think MySpace&#8217;s success shows that we designers don&#8217;t really know that much about other&#8217;s people&#8217;s definitions of good aesthetics, I&#8217;m not convinced. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Joshua Porter at  User Interface Engineer  thinks MySpace is  Good for Design. He&#8217;s right, it definitely sparks conversation. While some people think MySpace&#8217;s success shows that we designers don&#8217;t really know that much about other&#8217;s people&#8217;s definitions of good aesthetics, I&#8217;m not convinced. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MySpace: una leccion para los diseñadores? at Blëg</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-80779</link>
		<dc:creator>MySpace: una leccion para los diseñadores? at Blëg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 02:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-80779</guid>
		<description>[...] Joshua Porter, de User Interface Engineering, dispara el tema en un artículo del que traduzco algunos párrafos: No me sorprende que cada vez que [los diseñadores] hablamos de MySpace, se producen discusiones muy apasionadas. (…) No podemos imaginar que surja valor de algo tan espantoso, así que tenemos que preguntarle a los verdaderos usuarios de MySpace porqué están tan conectados con el sitio. (…) Las conversaciones que hemos tenido con usuarios de MySpace han cambiado realmente la forma en la que pensamos acerca del diseño… así como toda la propuesta de valores del software social. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Joshua Porter, de User Interface Engineering, dispara el tema en un artículo del que traduzco algunos párrafos: No me sorprende que cada vez que [los diseñadores] hablamos de MySpace, se producen discusiones muy apasionadas. (…) No podemos imaginar que surja valor de algo tan espantoso, así que tenemos que preguntarle a los verdaderos usuarios de MySpace porqué están tan conectados con el sitio. (…) Las conversaciones que hemos tenido con usuarios de MySpace han cambiado realmente la forma en la que pensamos acerca del diseño… así como toda la propuesta de valores del software social. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demian</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-79389</link>
		<dc:creator>Demian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-79389</guid>
		<description>Boxes. Normal people love boxes (with borders, that&#039;s it.) MySpace has lots of boxes people can put stuff in. That&#039;s all.
Designers love grids. Invisible grids, specially. That&#039;s VERY different stuff.
(I always wandered why when non-designers try to &quot;design&quot; something they usually use so many bordered boxes...)
:-P
Regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boxes. Normal people love boxes (with borders, that&#8217;s it.) MySpace has lots of boxes people can put stuff in. That&#8217;s all.<br />
Designers love grids. Invisible grids, specially. That&#8217;s VERY different stuff.<br />
(I always wandered why when non-designers try to &#8220;design&#8221; something they usually use so many bordered boxes&#8230;)<br />
 <img src='http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy White</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-77035</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 18:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-77035</guid>
		<description>People only feel uncomfortable with a nice design if they&#039;re also invited to completely change it. The general population is not designers. So if they are presented with a beautiful design and told, &quot;Go make something out of this&quot;, they know there is only one direction they can take it: worse design. 

But give them a crappy design and tell them to make something out of it and they&#039;ll have no problem. It already looks bad. I can make what I want. 
People DO understand good design. They LIKE good design. But they don&#039;t want to embarrass themselves. MySpace gives users the opportunity to create something without embarrassment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People only feel uncomfortable with a nice design if they&#8217;re also invited to completely change it. The general population is not designers. So if they are presented with a beautiful design and told, &#8220;Go make something out of this&#8221;, they know there is only one direction they can take it: worse design. </p>
<p>But give them a crappy design and tell them to make something out of it and they&#8217;ll have no problem. It already looks bad. I can make what I want.<br />
People DO understand good design. They LIKE good design. But they don&#8217;t want to embarrass themselves. MySpace gives users the opportunity to create something without embarrassment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafa</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-76376</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 09:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-76376</guid>
		<description>I think one very interesting point is that the main thing that attracts people at MySpace are its functionalities. The things you can *do* there, not how they look like. Also, those teenagers want to look &quot;different&quot; so they won&#039;t try to be &quot;formal&quot; or have the site look polite nor polished.

But let&#039;s not forget that, now, the main power of MySpace is that it has some kind of monopoly and &quot;if you&#039;re not in MySpace, you don&#039;t exist&quot;. I would bet that a lot of people are in MySpace simply because everybody else is there too (that&#039;s how me and my friends ended up switching, with pain, to MSN Messenger from IRC a few years ago).

How did MySpace get to that critical mass point? Well, let&#039;s not forget how MySpace originated and who created it—the key words are spam and marketing.

http://valleywag.com/tech/myspace/what-news-corp-doesnt-want-you-to-know-about-myspace-condensed-edition-199668.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one very interesting point is that the main thing that attracts people at MySpace are its functionalities. The things you can *do* there, not how they look like. Also, those teenagers want to look &#8220;different&#8221; so they won&#8217;t try to be &#8220;formal&#8221; or have the site look polite nor polished.</p>
<p>But let&#8217;s not forget that, now, the main power of MySpace is that it has some kind of monopoly and &#8220;if you&#8217;re not in MySpace, you don&#8217;t exist&#8221;. I would bet that a lot of people are in MySpace simply because everybody else is there too (that&#8217;s how me and my friends ended up switching, with pain, to MSN Messenger from IRC a few years ago).</p>
<p>How did MySpace get to that critical mass point? Well, let&#8217;s not forget how MySpace originated and who created it—the key words are spam and marketing.</p>
<p><a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/myspace/what-news-corp-doesnt-want-you-to-know-about-myspace-condensed-edition-199668.php" rel="nofollow">http://valleywag.com/tech/myspace/what-news-corp-doesnt-want-you-to-know-about-myspace-condensed-edition-199668.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Santiago Bustelo</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-74564</link>
		<dc:creator>Santiago Bustelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-74564</guid>
		<description>Perhaps what MySpace can teach designers, is that &quot;sophisticated&quot; interactive design is an oxymoron. Sophistication makes most people feel unconfortable and excluded from interaction. Think about a high Gunning-Fog index on aesthetical appeals.


I know many graphic designers that have bookmarked lots of cool, sophisticated websites for &quot;inspiration&quot;. But in their own experiences as users, they rarely visit a &quot;sophisticated&quot; or &quot;cool&quot; site twice. On the example of going for diner, you may like going to an special place once in a while, but end every other day of your life at McDonald&#039;s or worse... where no one cares if you&#039;re using the right fork 


On another subject, MySpace users are not designing, but trying to express theirselves. They fill their pages not only with things they have fun showing to others, but many times just have fun stuffing there. I totally agree that MySpace is like PowerPoint on crack: &quot;Hey, I crammed my page with 100 MP3 playing at once! Nobody else dares to do that! I rule!&quot;

I also think that MySpace is like a club where the beat makes your head and stomach ache, the drinks are poisonous and expensive, restrooms are awfully dirty, and have only steamy hot water running from the faucets. But it&#039;s crammed with people partying there. If you want to have a dance or a chat, that&#039;s your place... and you will do better if you sing along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps what MySpace can teach designers, is that &#8220;sophisticated&#8221; interactive design is an oxymoron. Sophistication makes most people feel unconfortable and excluded from interaction. Think about a high Gunning-Fog index on aesthetical appeals.</p>
<p>I know many graphic designers that have bookmarked lots of cool, sophisticated websites for &#8220;inspiration&#8221;. But in their own experiences as users, they rarely visit a &#8220;sophisticated&#8221; or &#8220;cool&#8221; site twice. On the example of going for diner, you may like going to an special place once in a while, but end every other day of your life at McDonald&#8217;s or worse&#8230; where no one cares if you&#8217;re using the right fork </p>
<p>On another subject, MySpace users are not designing, but trying to express theirselves. They fill their pages not only with things they have fun showing to others, but many times just have fun stuffing there. I totally agree that MySpace is like PowerPoint on crack: &#8220;Hey, I crammed my page with 100 MP3 playing at once! Nobody else dares to do that! I rule!&#8221;</p>
<p>I also think that MySpace is like a club where the beat makes your head and stomach ache, the drinks are poisonous and expensive, restrooms are awfully dirty, and have only steamy hot water running from the faucets. But it&#8217;s crammed with people partying there. If you want to have a dance or a chat, that&#8217;s your place&#8230; and you will do better if you sing along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-74489</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-74489</guid>
		<description>@Bee: I&#039;ve heard that argument before, and I&#039;m still wondering about it. I liken it to a diner, where lots of people like to eat in an atmosphere that is completely disarming...not a formal element in sight. Sometimes it is the quirkiness of the place that people see as &quot;charming&quot;...which I think is the angle you&#039;re going for here. 

What I have found is that the argument you&#039;re making really irks designers I&#039;ve talked to...in the sense that &quot;style&quot; can be empowering but not the &quot;unstyle&quot; of MySpace. It&#039;s a delicate balance...and a great topic for discussion. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bee: I&#8217;ve heard that argument before, and I&#8217;m still wondering about it. I liken it to a diner, where lots of people like to eat in an atmosphere that is completely disarming&#8230;not a formal element in sight. Sometimes it is the quirkiness of the place that people see as &#8220;charming&#8221;&#8230;which I think is the angle you&#8217;re going for here. </p>
<p>What I have found is that the argument you&#8217;re making really irks designers I&#8217;ve talked to&#8230;in the sense that &#8220;style&#8221; can be empowering but not the &#8220;unstyle&#8221; of MySpace. It&#8217;s a delicate balance&#8230;and a great topic for discussion. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-74486</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-74486</guid>
		<description>@J.K: That&#039;s an interesting analogy. Both can be seen as tools for communication, and both can be abused so that communication is lost. 

Every time I got to a MySpace page with music, my head hurts. But, I&#039;ve observed users do it and they really enjoy it. In some ways the obscurity of disorienting music acts like a filter for the audience. If someone doesn&#039;t &quot;get&quot; what you&#039;re doing, they&#039;re probably not supposed to. 

And you&#039;re absolutely right, it is very much about pride in ownership and creation...that&#039;s an important point that isn&#039;t talked about enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@J.K: That&#8217;s an interesting analogy. Both can be seen as tools for communication, and both can be abused so that communication is lost. </p>
<p>Every time I got to a MySpace page with music, my head hurts. But, I&#8217;ve observed users do it and they really enjoy it. In some ways the obscurity of disorienting music acts like a filter for the audience. If someone doesn&#8217;t &#8220;get&#8221; what you&#8217;re doing, they&#8217;re probably not supposed to. </p>
<p>And you&#8217;re absolutely right, it is very much about pride in ownership and creation&#8230;that&#8217;s an important point that isn&#8217;t talked about enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bee</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-74378</link>
		<dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-74378</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t it also for some users be a case of &#039;because&#039; of the design and not &#039;despite&#039;? Could MySpace&#039;s prevailing visual mess curb inhibitions? It could be an antidote to any innate fears of spoiling &#039;a clean white sheet of paper&#039;. No worries about looking trashy and amateurish - everybody does. Dive right in - anything goes - it&#039;s dirty and immediate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t it also for some users be a case of &#8216;because&#8217; of the design and not &#8216;despite&#8217;? Could MySpace&#8217;s prevailing visual mess curb inhibitions? It could be an antidote to any innate fears of spoiling &#8216;a clean white sheet of paper&#8217;. No worries about looking trashy and amateurish &#8211; everybody does. Dive right in &#8211; anything goes &#8211; it&#8217;s dirty and immediate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.K</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-74261</link>
		<dc:creator>J.K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-74261</guid>
		<description>Know what MySpace reminds me of? PowerPoint. People love making PowerPoints and using clip art, animation, and twenty different font types, colors, and sizes. Do you know the time and effort people spend on the worst-looking powerpoints? And how proud they are afterwards?

MySpace is like that, but on crack. You can add songs and movie clips and slideshows, not to mention font colors and clip art. And the whole world can see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Know what MySpace reminds me of? PowerPoint. People love making PowerPoints and using clip art, animation, and twenty different font types, colors, and sizes. Do you know the time and effort people spend on the worst-looking powerpoints? And how proud they are afterwards?</p>
<p>MySpace is like that, but on crack. You can add songs and movie clips and slideshows, not to mention font colors and clip art. And the whole world can see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucrative Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-72297</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucrative Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-72297</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Throw Away Everything You Think You Know About How Your Website Should Look...&lt;/strong&gt;

Joshua Porter at User Interface Engineering notes:
You’ve got to hand it to MySpace. The designers there have done the impossible: they’ve created a site that tramples on the aesthetic sensibilities of nearly everyone while continuing to grow and b...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Throw Away Everything You Think You Know About How Your Website Should Look&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Joshua Porter at User Interface Engineering notes:<br />
You’ve got to hand it to MySpace. The designers there have done the impossible: they’ve created a site that tramples on the aesthetic sensibilities of nearly everyone while continuing to grow and b&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-72156</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-72156</guid>
		<description>My IT and technical writing backgrounds have given me exposure to GUI design and usability issues.  I&#039;ve also been an avid myspace user for about 2 yrs. (Not to chat or collect friends, but because I&#039;m involved with the local music scene in my town, and myspace has become an invaluable networking tool for that.)

The general public might not understand &quot;good&quot; design, and yes that is oh-so-obvious on some people&#039;s profiles. (Their color choices and tons of animations make me cringe.) HOWEVER, there *is* an underlying structure to all profile pages. Even if someone has customized their page, you still know generally where to look for the links to comments, their friends list, their picture gallery, etc, and you know where to look for the tool bar back to the myspace interface. That does not change regardless of how horridly someone&#039;s profile has been personalized.

A bigger issue for users is, new users have no clue how to get started or how to add friends. They get no comments on their page, because they have no friends, but don&#039;t know that&#039;s why. They don&#039;t understand they need to build their social network, and don&#039;t know how to go about that. 

How would interface design help these folks? Being a technical writer, my answer would be, they need instruction on what to do next, or how to get started. But who reads the help!!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My IT and technical writing backgrounds have given me exposure to GUI design and usability issues.  I&#8217;ve also been an avid myspace user for about 2 yrs. (Not to chat or collect friends, but because I&#8217;m involved with the local music scene in my town, and myspace has become an invaluable networking tool for that.)</p>
<p>The general public might not understand &#8220;good&#8221; design, and yes that is oh-so-obvious on some people&#8217;s profiles. (Their color choices and tons of animations make me cringe.) HOWEVER, there *is* an underlying structure to all profile pages. Even if someone has customized their page, you still know generally where to look for the links to comments, their friends list, their picture gallery, etc, and you know where to look for the tool bar back to the myspace interface. That does not change regardless of how horridly someone&#8217;s profile has been personalized.</p>
<p>A bigger issue for users is, new users have no clue how to get started or how to add friends. They get no comments on their page, because they have no friends, but don&#8217;t know that&#8217;s why. They don&#8217;t understand they need to build their social network, and don&#8217;t know how to go about that. </p>
<p>How would interface design help these folks? Being a technical writer, my answer would be, they need instruction on what to do next, or how to get started. But who reads the help!!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teun</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-72063</link>
		<dc:creator>Teun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-72063</guid>
		<description>BTW: The long tail also applies to social network sites. You can hook up with people you haven&#039;t seen since you were in your diapers :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW: The long tail also applies to social network sites. You can hook up with people you haven&#8217;t seen since you were in your diapers <img src='http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teun</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-72061</link>
		<dc:creator>Teun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-72061</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with lucasamanda. I feel the success of MySpace and it&#039;s Dutch equivalent Hyves.nl lies in the fact that they are the next evolution of &#039;social&#039; web-phenomena like Forums (while being more readily accessible than Second Life, which might be the summit in the evolution of &#039;social&#039; web phenomena). While Forums forced users to meet in a &#039;general&#039;/&#039;public&#039; place, social network sites enable users to meet at each other&#039;s homes.

And don&#039;t underestimate the bandwagon effect. I recently started using Hyves.nl, despite all its design flaws and performance issues, just because of the immense social pressure of all my friends who were already using it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with lucasamanda. I feel the success of MySpace and it&#8217;s Dutch equivalent Hyves.nl lies in the fact that they are the next evolution of &#8216;social&#8217; web-phenomena like Forums (while being more readily accessible than Second Life, which might be the summit in the evolution of &#8216;social&#8217; web phenomena). While Forums forced users to meet in a &#8216;general&#8217;/'public&#8217; place, social network sites enable users to meet at each other&#8217;s homes.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t underestimate the bandwagon effect. I recently started using Hyves.nl, despite all its design flaws and performance issues, just because of the immense social pressure of all my friends who were already using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Shively</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-71894</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Shively</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-71894</guid>
		<description>I think that what lucasamanda said is accurate it is not the usability of MySpace that draws it&#039;s users it is that they offer a service that no one else did at the time of MySpaces rise. It allows its users the ability to gather on a social ground and chat, post, and express themselves online - for free. Other sites want them to pay for these things. If MySpace charged for this service there would be less enthusiasm I think.

If you are the first to offer a product/service that no one else offers it really is despite the design that they succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that what lucasamanda said is accurate it is not the usability of MySpace that draws it&#8217;s users it is that they offer a service that no one else did at the time of MySpaces rise. It allows its users the ability to gather on a social ground and chat, post, and express themselves online &#8211; for free. Other sites want them to pay for these things. If MySpace charged for this service there would be less enthusiasm I think.</p>
<p>If you are the first to offer a product/service that no one else offers it really is despite the design that they succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-71797</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-71797</guid>
		<description>@Tamlyn: If more users don&#039;t understand design, and use sites like MySpace with obviously lacking visual design, what, then, is the value of design? Is it a differentiator...or just something that we can charge a lot of money for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tamlyn: If more users don&#8217;t understand design, and use sites like MySpace with obviously lacking visual design, what, then, is the value of design? Is it a differentiator&#8230;or just something that we can charge a lot of money for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-71796</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-71796</guid>
		<description>@lucasamanda : Your assertion that people use MySpace solely on function is an interesting one. Can that teach us anything about how we design other web sites? Is this unique to MySpace, or can we apply it elsewhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@lucasamanda : Your assertion that people use MySpace solely on function is an interesting one. Can that teach us anything about how we design other web sites? Is this unique to MySpace, or can we apply it elsewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamlyn Rhodes</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-71744</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamlyn Rhodes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 09:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-71744</guid>
		<description>It is important for us web types to understand that many/most web users do not understand design, good or bad. A myspace page with unreadably large text and huge images that break the layout isn&#039;t immediately different from another page with small text and a flyout menu for navigation. Each page presents certain difficulties for users (even if the second is clearly easier for us) and they muddle through without any notion of which is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is important for us web types to understand that many/most web users do not understand design, good or bad. A myspace page with unreadably large text and huge images that break the layout isn&#8217;t immediately different from another page with small text and a flyout menu for navigation. Each page presents certain difficulties for users (even if the second is clearly easier for us) and they muddle through without any notion of which is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucasamanda</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-71679</link>
		<dc:creator>lucasamanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 01:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-71679</guid>
		<description>I think that most people who use MySpace would do so regardless of the design. The function of MySpace, rather than the design, drives its success.  Users are there to express themselves, or to see how others have done the same, and what is on the Home page is of less concern to them.  The users’ purpose motivates them beyond any aspects of the design that are poor or even annoying.  Incidentally, the Home page today (4/15) has changed, with the music page in the role of headache-inducer.  At least I had to click twice to see it.  

Looking at the above screenshot reminds me of another site—where people might turn for sports information and news--that I think is equally headache-inducing.  In this latter case, I believe that some of the design elements obscure the information presented, a more serious offense on that site, since its purpose is informational, as well as entertainment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that most people who use MySpace would do so regardless of the design. The function of MySpace, rather than the design, drives its success.  Users are there to express themselves, or to see how others have done the same, and what is on the Home page is of less concern to them.  The users’ purpose motivates them beyond any aspects of the design that are poor or even annoying.  Incidentally, the Home page today (4/15) has changed, with the music page in the role of headache-inducer.  At least I had to click twice to see it.  </p>
<p>Looking at the above screenshot reminds me of another site—where people might turn for sports information and news&#8211;that I think is equally headache-inducing.  In this latter case, I believe that some of the design elements obscure the information presented, a more serious offense on that site, since its purpose is informational, as well as entertainment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Garcia</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-71091</link>
		<dc:creator>David Garcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-71091</guid>
		<description>I put together a web site where people can post about their businesses and products. I considered making an extensive design portal that lets people click on things and in the end build sites that look like they were done by professionals. The reality was that was not what people wanted, they wanted to just put themselves online and create to the best of their abilities something that they own. They can point to it and say they did it (and it is obvious that they did... it looks horrible) But it is what people want. At least right now. Maybe some day the average user will be a good designer and nasty MySpace pages will be shunned for their aesthetics despite their extensive networks and content. Will have to wait and see...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I put together a web site where people can post about their businesses and products. I considered making an extensive design portal that lets people click on things and in the end build sites that look like they were done by professionals. The reality was that was not what people wanted, they wanted to just put themselves online and create to the best of their abilities something that they own. They can point to it and say they did it (and it is obvious that they did&#8230; it looks horrible) But it is what people want. At least right now. Maybe some day the average user will be a good designer and nasty MySpace pages will be shunned for their aesthetics despite their extensive networks and content. Will have to wait and see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Broden</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/comment-page-1/#comment-71082</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Broden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 23:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/04/13/why-myspace-is-good-for-design/#comment-71082</guid>
		<description>I think that MySpace has succeeded in part because it allows its members such latitude for self-expression. Everyone is a designer. Not everyone is a good designer. But being given a outlet for creative urges trumps aesthetics.

With increasing frequency, we &quot;professional&quot; designers will be called upon to design systems that allow users much more latitude for self-expression. I actually find that quite an exciting challenge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that MySpace has succeeded in part because it allows its members such latitude for self-expression. Everyone is a designer. Not everyone is a good designer. But being given a outlet for creative urges trumps aesthetics.</p>
<p>With increasing frequency, we &#8220;professional&#8221; designers will be called upon to design systems that allow users much more latitude for self-expression. I actually find that quite an exciting challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

