<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qualitative Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/07/25/qualitative-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/07/25/qualitative-research/</link>
	<description>UIE\'s latest insights on the world of design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:11:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is qualitative research science or art? &#124; Zebra Research</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/07/25/qualitative-research/comment-page-1/#comment-153603</link>
		<dc:creator>Is qualitative research science or art? &#124; Zebra Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 03:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/07/25/qualitative-research/#comment-153603</guid>
		<description>[...] really. I came across this the other day, which made me [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] really. I came across this the other day, which made me [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zebra Research &#187; Is qualitative research science or art?</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/07/25/qualitative-research/comment-page-1/#comment-151793</link>
		<dc:creator>Zebra Research &#187; Is qualitative research science or art?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/07/25/qualitative-research/#comment-151793</guid>
		<description>[...] really. I came across this the other day, which made me [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] really. I came across this the other day, which made me [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/07/25/qualitative-research/comment-page-1/#comment-84157</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 20:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/07/25/qualitative-research/#comment-84157</guid>
		<description>Michael is correct, and perhaps understating the point.  There&#039;s nothing inherently more scientific to quantitative data and analysis than there is to qualitative data.  One can follow the principles of scientific inquiry either way.  Unfortunately, K-12 education perpetuates some peculiar and entirely inaccurate notions of what exactly it means to be scientific.  Science isn&#039;t defined by the phenomenon being studied--it is not a subject.  And it is not intrinsically linked to quantitative data--&quot;math and science&quot; are fully separate.  

Science is a particular set of epistemological principles, values about the process we use to build and evaluate knowledge.  I&#039;m no less as scientist when I work with NVivo or Atlas.TI to analyze qualitative data as a way to test hypotheses than I am when I do the same using SPSS or JMP when working with a quantitative dataset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael is correct, and perhaps understating the point.  There&#8217;s nothing inherently more scientific to quantitative data and analysis than there is to qualitative data.  One can follow the principles of scientific inquiry either way.  Unfortunately, K-12 education perpetuates some peculiar and entirely inaccurate notions of what exactly it means to be scientific.  Science isn&#8217;t defined by the phenomenon being studied&#8211;it is not a subject.  And it is not intrinsically linked to quantitative data&#8211;&#8221;math and science&#8221; are fully separate.  </p>
<p>Science is a particular set of epistemological principles, values about the process we use to build and evaluate knowledge.  I&#8217;m no less as scientist when I work with NVivo or Atlas.TI to analyze qualitative data as a way to test hypotheses than I am when I do the same using SPSS or JMP when working with a quantitative dataset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/07/25/qualitative-research/comment-page-1/#comment-83287</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/07/25/qualitative-research/#comment-83287</guid>
		<description>I take exception to the term &quot;unscientific&quot; being applied to qualitative research. Qualitative research has its origins in the naturalistic inquiry methods of the social sciences, such as anthropology and sociology. There is nothing unscientific about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take exception to the term &#8220;unscientific&#8221; being applied to qualitative research. Qualitative research has its origins in the naturalistic inquiry methods of the social sciences, such as anthropology and sociology. There is nothing unscientific about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blog.dsetia.com&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Qualitative Research</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/07/25/qualitative-research/comment-page-1/#comment-83259</link>
		<dc:creator>blog.dsetia.com&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Qualitative Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/07/25/qualitative-research/#comment-83259</guid>
		<description>[...] Ashley McKee points out a series of articles by Leisa Reichelt that discuss accepting the unscientific qualities of qualitative research, and using qualitative research as a flexible way to gather rich and insightful information about your intended audience. Source: [Link] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ashley McKee points out a series of articles by Leisa Reichelt that discuss accepting the unscientific qualities of qualitative research, and using qualitative research as a flexible way to gather rich and insightful information about your intended audience. Source: [Link] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

