<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UIEtips Article: Goal-Directed Design: An Interview with Kim Goodwin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/08/15/uietips-article-goal-directed-design-an-interview-with-kim-goodwin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/08/15/uietips-article-goal-directed-design-an-interview-with-kim-goodwin/</link>
	<description>UIE\'s latest insights on the world of design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:11:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/08/15/uietips-article-goal-directed-design-an-interview-with-kim-goodwin/comment-page-1/#comment-85157</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/08/15/uietips-article-goal-directed-design-an-interview-with-kim-goodwin/#comment-85157</guid>
		<description>We currently conduct usability testing as well as paper prototype tests to gather user feedback.  Because our &quot;product&quot; is a website that is potentially accessible by many different types of users, we recruit participants using a fairly broad screening process.  About 2 years ago, we developed 5 personas based on site behavior and survey feedback, and this year it is our goal to integrate/examine some of our recent usability studies to determine if these personas still persist.  Any thoughts on the frequency a company should &quot;revisit&quot; their persona classifications?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We currently conduct usability testing as well as paper prototype tests to gather user feedback.  Because our &#8220;product&#8221; is a website that is potentially accessible by many different types of users, we recruit participants using a fairly broad screening process.  About 2 years ago, we developed 5 personas based on site behavior and survey feedback, and this year it is our goal to integrate/examine some of our recent usability studies to determine if these personas still persist.  Any thoughts on the frequency a company should &#8220;revisit&#8221; their persona classifications?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

