<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SpoolCast: An Interview with Cameron Moll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/10/17/spoolcast-an-interview-with-cameron-moll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/10/17/spoolcast-an-interview-with-cameron-moll/</link>
	<description>UIE\'s latest insights on the world of design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:51:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nate Klaiber</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/10/17/spoolcast-an-interview-with-cameron-moll/comment-page-1/#comment-91000</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Klaiber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/10/17/spoolcast-an-interview-with-cameron-moll/#comment-91000</guid>
		<description>Excellent interview. Having worked in environments where they bought a &#039;SharePoint&#039; like application, I can relate to much of what was being said in the conversation. Organizations like that don&#039;t want to pay to build, they want to buy and piece everything together. However, in the long run - they end up paying for it because it requires so many modifications to do just what they needed. Wouldn&#039;t it be much smarter to build just what you need?

I recently worked within a Java application where there were certain pieces I couldn&#039;t change at all - they were abstracted in the core of the application, making it a bear to really tweak things as deemed necessary.

Thanks for posting the interview....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent interview. Having worked in environments where they bought a &#8216;SharePoint&#8217; like application, I can relate to much of what was being said in the conversation. Organizations like that don&#8217;t want to pay to build, they want to buy and piece everything together. However, in the long run &#8211; they end up paying for it because it requires so many modifications to do just what they needed. Wouldn&#8217;t it be much smarter to build just what you need?</p>
<p>I recently worked within a Java application where there were certain pieces I couldn&#8217;t change at all &#8211; they were abstracted in the core of the application, making it a bear to really tweak things as deemed necessary.</p>
<p>Thanks for posting the interview&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
