<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Usability Tools Podcast: Robust Personas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/11/21/usability-tools-podcast-robust-personas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/11/21/usability-tools-podcast-robust-personas/</link>
	<description>UIE\'s latest insights on the world of design</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  5 Dec 2008 11:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Caroline Pickering</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/11/21/usability-tools-podcast-robust-personas/#comment-99191</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline Pickering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/11/21/usability-tools-podcast-robust-personas/#comment-99191</guid>
		<description>Hi there

Great seminar and follow up podcast!

Our team were wondering whether you have any particular advice on using this method for the design of applications which may have a multitude of 'bits' of functionality? We see that there would be a need to focus the effort of persona creation in some way but how would we do this to best effect? 

Does application development necessarily imply that many personas have to be created over the course of the project to deal with the real detail of the application's functionality OR is there some way of keep the number of personas down without reducing their effectiveness, perhaps by applying them to more broadly defined functionality. Hope that makes sense!

Caroline Pickering (Sigmer Technologies Ltd, UK)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there</p>
<p>Great seminar and follow up podcast!</p>
<p>Our team were wondering whether you have any particular advice on using this method for the design of applications which may have a multitude of &#8216;bits&#8217; of functionality? We see that there would be a need to focus the effort of persona creation in some way but how would we do this to best effect? </p>
<p>Does application development necessarily imply that many personas have to be created over the course of the project to deal with the real detail of the application&#8217;s functionality OR is there some way of keep the number of personas down without reducing their effectiveness, perhaps by applying them to more broadly defined functionality. Hope that makes sense!</p>
<p>Caroline Pickering (Sigmer Technologies Ltd, UK)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Szuc</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/11/21/usability-tools-podcast-robust-personas/#comment-97116</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Szuc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 06:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2007/11/21/usability-tools-podcast-robust-personas/#comment-97116</guid>
		<description>Great listening.

Favorite quote - "People are basically the same" - Amen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great listening.</p>
<p>Favorite quote - &#8220;People are basically the same&#8221; - Amen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
