<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Article: Interview-Based Tasks: Learning from Leonardo DiCaprio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2010/01/19/uietips-06-03-07/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2010/01/19/uietips-06-03-07/</link>
	<description>UIE\'s latest insights on the world of design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:22:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Birnbaum</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2010/01/19/uietips-06-03-07/comment-page-1/#comment-149779</link>
		<dc:creator>David Birnbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=197#comment-149779</guid>
		<description>Love the approach, but how does this work with lower fidelity testing (paper sketches, screenshots, partially working demo site, etc)? Seems like you need a fully developed site (and in the case of ecommerce, the site would need to be fully merchandised as well) so that the user has the flexibility to go down whatever path she thinks is best given the tasks you&#039;ve developed together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the approach, but how does this work with lower fidelity testing (paper sketches, screenshots, partially working demo site, etc)? Seems like you need a fully developed site (and in the case of ecommerce, the site would need to be fully merchandised as well) so that the user has the flexibility to go down whatever path she thinks is best given the tasks you&#8217;ve developed together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joaquin Garrido</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2010/01/19/uietips-06-03-07/comment-page-1/#comment-149776</link>
		<dc:creator>Joaquin Garrido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=197#comment-149776</guid>
		<description>So... what happened with the rest of that meeting with the VP of Marketing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; what happened with the rest of that meeting with the VP of Marketing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Spool</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2010/01/19/uietips-06-03-07/comment-page-1/#comment-2029</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Spool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=197#comment-2029</guid>
		<description>Dan Brown points us to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greenonions.com/archives/2005/03/30/task-free-usability-testing-summary-of-upa-seminar/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this write up on a panel on this topic&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Brown points us to <a href="http://www.greenonions.com/archives/2005/03/30/task-free-usability-testing-summary-of-upa-seminar/" rel="nofollow">this write up on a panel on this topic</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2010/01/19/uietips-06-03-07/comment-page-1/#comment-1924</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 21:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=197#comment-1924</guid>
		<description>Hi, Jared! 

Yes, when I was consulting last year with a well-known New York-based usability consultancy, we used this technique to great effect on e-commerce sites. I think it&#039;s because everybody, more or less, has shopped at some point in their lives and relevant tasks aren&#039;t too difficult to shape on the fly.

The real skill rests with a moderator who can ask the right questions during the interview and use that data to suggest the right tasks. You certainly get more natural behavior because the user is focusing on the things HE/SHE find relevant or important.

Downside is that it can be hard to shape those tasks; the technique may not work for more directed applications such as specialized software; it&#039;s tough to assign statistical rigor; and it takes time to craft the tasks. You also run the risk of the user veering well away from the site or issue the client is interested in. In those cases, the art of &quot;gentle steering without leading&quot; comes into play.

Yell at me when you&#039;re in Dallas next!  Best regards to you &amp; Christine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Jared! </p>
<p>Yes, when I was consulting last year with a well-known New York-based usability consultancy, we used this technique to great effect on e-commerce sites. I think it&#8217;s because everybody, more or less, has shopped at some point in their lives and relevant tasks aren&#8217;t too difficult to shape on the fly.</p>
<p>The real skill rests with a moderator who can ask the right questions during the interview and use that data to suggest the right tasks. You certainly get more natural behavior because the user is focusing on the things HE/SHE find relevant or important.</p>
<p>Downside is that it can be hard to shape those tasks; the technique may not work for more directed applications such as specialized software; it&#8217;s tough to assign statistical rigor; and it takes time to craft the tasks. You also run the risk of the user veering well away from the site or issue the client is interested in. In those cases, the art of &#8220;gentle steering without leading&#8221; comes into play.</p>
<p>Yell at me when you&#8217;re in Dallas next!  Best regards to you &amp; Christine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Spool</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2010/01/19/uietips-06-03-07/comment-page-1/#comment-1918</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Spool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 17:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=197#comment-1918</guid>
		<description>Michael: Fixed. (It was a cut &amp; paste problem.) Thanks for noticing it and letting us know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael: Fixed. (It was a cut &amp; paste problem.) Thanks for noticing it and letting us know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2010/01/19/uietips-06-03-07/comment-page-1/#comment-1911</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 11:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=197#comment-1911</guid>
		<description>It took a LONG time to get to the article on interview-based tasks. I kept taking the link that said, &quot;Read the article here&quot; thinking it would take me to the article on interview-based tasks (since that was the title of the page I was on and since that is what the discussion had been about up to that point. Instead, it took me to an article from 2001 about download times. Huh! go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took a LONG time to get to the article on interview-based tasks. I kept taking the link that said, &#8220;Read the article here&#8221; thinking it would take me to the article on interview-based tasks (since that was the title of the page I was on and since that is what the discussion had been about up to that point. Instead, it took me to an article from 2001 about download times. Huh! go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
