<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UIEtips: Classification Schemes &#8212; and When to Use Them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2010/09/07/uietips-classification-schemes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2010/09/07/uietips-classification-schemes/</link>
	<description>UIE\'s latest insights on the world of design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:13:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin Young</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2010/09/07/uietips-classification-schemes/comment-page-1/#comment-152783</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=2549#comment-152783</guid>
		<description>Donna (&amp; Jared) - I am glad to hear your intuition about format-based classification schemes -- I also suspect that most users are first concerned with their task or topic and that format is a secondary consideration.  I&#039;d love to see or hear any data that confirms this intuition.

I&#039;d also love to see a stab at guidelines on when a mixture of classification types should be used at the same level.  I&#039;ve forward this event along to some partners that are currently developing a taxonomy.  

I appreciate both of your work.  Thanks guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donna (&amp; Jared) &#8211; I am glad to hear your intuition about format-based classification schemes &#8212; I also suspect that most users are first concerned with their task or topic and that format is a secondary consideration.  I&#8217;d love to see or hear any data that confirms this intuition.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also love to see a stab at guidelines on when a mixture of classification types should be used at the same level.  I&#8217;ve forward this event along to some partners that are currently developing a taxonomy.  </p>
<p>I appreciate both of your work.  Thanks guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
