<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moving from Critical Review to Critique</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2011/10/27/moving-from-critical-review-to-critique/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2011/10/27/moving-from-critical-review-to-critique/</link>
	<description>UIE\'s latest insights on the world of design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 02:00:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To Sell Your UX Design Solution To Clients - Goodfav Howto</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2011/10/27/moving-from-critical-review-to-critique/comment-page-1/#comment-251779</link>
		<dc:creator>How To Sell Your UX Design Solution To Clients - Goodfav Howto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 07:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=5683#comment-251779</guid>
		<description>[...] the process and how we’ve arrived at a particular solution. Collaborative design sessions, with specific guidelines for critique, are essential in these [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the process and how we’ve arrived at a particular solution. Collaborative design sessions, with specific guidelines for critique, are essential in these [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The fragile relationship between Ego and Design</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2011/10/27/moving-from-critical-review-to-critique/comment-page-1/#comment-221439</link>
		<dc:creator>The fragile relationship between Ego and Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 07:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=5683#comment-221439</guid>
		<description>[...] Moving from Critical Review to Critique [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Moving from Critical Review to Critique [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do you want critique, or a hug?</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2011/10/27/moving-from-critical-review-to-critique/comment-page-1/#comment-217196</link>
		<dc:creator>Do you want critique, or a hug?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 06:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=5683#comment-217196</guid>
		<description>[...] of critiques, this is my preferred process to get the most value out of them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of critiques, this is my preferred process to get the most value out of them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hogir Habasch</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2011/10/27/moving-from-critical-review-to-critique/comment-page-1/#comment-172088</link>
		<dc:creator>Hogir Habasch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=5683#comment-172088</guid>
		<description>This is a great post! I like the general philosophy of how criticism should be applied from your point of view. 
I knew this kind of &#039;bad&#039; behaviour from myself but also from my colleagues where you tell the presenter what he has done wrong even before he/she started his presentation. 
Luckily, I&#039;ve realised that telling other people what they made wrong is very easy and more importantly doesn&#039;t create a productive and comfortable environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post! I like the general philosophy of how criticism should be applied from your point of view.<br />
I knew this kind of &#8216;bad&#8217; behaviour from myself but also from my colleagues where you tell the presenter what he has done wrong even before he/she started his presentation.<br />
Luckily, I&#8217;ve realised that telling other people what they made wrong is very easy and more importantly doesn&#8217;t create a productive and comfortable environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nina Salet</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2011/10/27/moving-from-critical-review-to-critique/comment-page-1/#comment-172060</link>
		<dc:creator>Nina Salet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 04:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=5683#comment-172060</guid>
		<description>Thank you Jared, I would like to apply the structure given on critique technique on kwalitative analysis when doing user experience research with students. In order to get less bias analysing data.  Students doing open interviews, recording and analysing data may be less rigid on subjectivity when working in a clear setting that diggs up rationale. Receiving critique as a matter of exploring different perspectives. Iteration after iteration one can unviel common interest of people and systems in order to accomplirons davantage .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Jared, I would like to apply the structure given on critique technique on kwalitative analysis when doing user experience research with students. In order to get less bias analysing data.  Students doing open interviews, recording and analysing data may be less rigid on subjectivity when working in a clear setting that diggs up rationale. Receiving critique as a matter of exploring different perspectives. Iteration after iteration one can unviel common interest of people and systems in order to accomplirons davantage .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Malouf</title>
		<link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2011/10/27/moving-from-critical-review-to-critique/comment-page-1/#comment-171959</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Malouf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/?p=5683#comment-171959</guid>
		<description>This was an awesome post, Jared.mthank you for not only the reasoning, but the practical suggestion &amp; structure.

One thing I try to aim for in critiques is to get the designer criticizing their own work, based on the conversation. If that occurs, you will see a better synergy between the critique and the outcome.

The separation of design from criticism though (creating a new space) is counter to the success of the studio, where designing and criticism happen all the time. I understand why this might have to happen w/ different stakeholders, but critique happening fluidly, in the context of designing is most successful.

- Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was an awesome post, Jared.mthank you for not only the reasoning, but the practical suggestion &amp; structure.</p>
<p>One thing I try to aim for in critiques is to get the designer criticizing their own work, based on the conversation. If that occurs, you will see a better synergy between the critique and the outcome.</p>
<p>The separation of design from criticism though (creating a new space) is counter to the success of the studio, where designing and criticism happen all the time. I understand why this might have to happen w/ different stakeholders, but critique happening fluidly, in the context of designing is most successful.</p>
<p>- Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
